VHTO - Landelijk expertisebureau meisjes/vrouwen en bta/techniek


Title: Gender and Clarity of Evaluation among Academic Scientists in Research Universities

Authors: Mary Frank Fox 

PublishedScience, Technology, and Human Values 40 (July 2015): 487-515

This article addresses a telling issue in academic science: the clarity of criteria for tenure and promotion reported by women and men faculty in scientific fields. Data from faculty surveyed in nine US research universities point to ways that formal and informal organizational indicators predict the clarity of evaluation reported by women and men. Unexpected patterns occur by gender. Among men, both formal and informal organizational indicators, as well as field, predict their reported clarity of evaluation. Among women, however, only informal organizational indicators, namely, frequency of speaking with faculty about research and departmental climate, are significant predictors. Further, overall, informal indicators are stronger predictors of clarity than are formal indicators, and some field differences occur. These findings have implications for national and regional science policies and for the practices and policies of universities.